🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation details a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Officials say it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Further up the shoreline is situated the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working overseas. His parent said she lost sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the appropriate answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in life after death, providing a theological viewpoint on the physical loss of hallowed earth.